Question for controllers about I8 Route String (TEC)

Questions and comments about the PE Pilot Training Program

Question for controllers about I8 Route String (TEC)

Postby bjratchf » Fri Feb 21, 2020 6:13 pm

On the I8 we are flying from AVX to SAN using a TEC route- SXC V208 LAX118R CARDI MZB320R MZB... when put into skyvector it looks like the route is equal to SXC V208 HUBRD CARDI MZB- which is how I'd stick it into a GPS. Is it written this way due to the fact that some aircraft are /A and would need to plug in the 118R from LAX, etc? Or is it because otherwise the FAA computer spits it back out?
bjratchf
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed May 27, 2015 10:23 pm

Re: Question for controllers about I8 Route String (TEC)

Postby kullery » Sat Feb 22, 2020 5:12 am

I'm not a controller, but I can tell you that historically the TEC routes were defined on the assumption that aircraft were not RNAV (i.e. GPS) capable. Therefore, the majority of the TEC routes only include way points which can flown /A.

A relatively recent change has been the creation of 11 "parallel" routes which originate in the San Diego area. These are designated with an "R" suffix (i.e. SANP4R vs. SANP4). These routes require RNAV capability, are generally more efficient and may include way points which don't even appear on the en-route IFR charts.
Ken Ullery - PPL-SEL, 1G5
MyFlightRoute.com
Image
kullery
 
Posts: 391
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:13 am
Location: Medina, OH


Return to Pilot Training Program

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron