SLI5 SLI SLI171R ALBAS V25 PACIF V208 LAX118R CARDI MZB320R MZB Is the preferred routing... according to ZLA tec routes vatsim page..
Initially I filed something similar:
SLI5 SLI ALBAS V25 PACIF V208 HUBRD CARDI MZB
Aren't these routes the exact same?
LAX - SAN tec route
LAX - SAN tec route
PE ID: 29
FAA ATCS
FAA PPL ASEL
FAA ATCS
FAA PPL ASEL
-
- Posts: 1752
- Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 3:48 pm
- Location: Novi Sad, Serbia
Re: LAX - SAN tec route
They are. I was dealing with another pilot who needed quite a bit of my attention. So rather than potentially missing a possible error in the filed one, I just let the system enter the route as it has it within it. Hence why the FRC
-
- Posts: 9939
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 8:38 pm
- Location: Pompton Plains, NJ
- Contact:
Re: LAX - SAN tec route
They're the same track over the ground. HUBRD direct CARDI implies RNAV capability, whereas the published route is flyable with VOR only.
Re: LAX - SAN tec route
Completely fair... that's actually what I was thinking heheAlex Stjepanovic wrote:They are. I was dealing with another pilot who needed quite a bit of my attention. So rather than potentially missing a possible error in the filed one, I just let the system enter the route as it has it within it. Hence why the FRC
Sorry I had to go - screaming child needed attention
PE ID: 29
FAA ATCS
FAA PPL ASEL
FAA ATCS
FAA PPL ASEL