How functional is 10.3's stock gps? I may be tasked with setting up a system for IFR training and part of it hinges on having an accurate gps for approaches. I am used to rxp in xp9. But if the stock units database in 10.3 can be updated and all logic is same or very close I may feel better about setting it up with xp10.3(i believe rxp can be made to work in xp 10 32bit) but i havent done it yet.
Also the student flys a 206 and carenado doesnt support xp9 anymore as far as i see.
Thanks
10.3 gps vs rxp
-
- Posts: 140
- Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2014 12:36 pm
- Location: MI USA
- Contact:
Re: 10.3 gps vs rxp
The new GPS was built by Philip primarily to aid him with his IFR training. Here's a writeup on it straight from the dev:
http://developer.x-plane.com/2014/03/ne ... ane-10-30/
My experience has been extremely positive. Every airplane that has it has been made much better.
http://developer.x-plane.com/2014/03/ne ... ane-10-30/
My experience has been extremely positive. Every airplane that has it has been made much better.
-
- Posts: 9939
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 8:38 pm
- Location: Pompton Plains, NJ
- Contact:
Re: 10.3 gps vs rxp
the 10.3 gps upgrade is a great step, but the moment I started trying to do the things I do in my airplane, it fell short.
I would use SImAVIO's Garmin implementation if it's for r/w flight training.
I would use SImAVIO's Garmin implementation if it's for r/w flight training.
-
- Posts: 140
- Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2014 12:36 pm
- Location: MI USA
- Contact:
Re: 10.3 gps vs rxp
Thats what I recently figured out as well. Nice effort on the stock gps in 10.3 though!
I was able to get the rxp430 working in 10.3 demo so thats good.
I was able to get the rxp430 working in 10.3 demo so thats good.