10.3 gps vs rxp

Post Reply
sellener777
Posts: 140
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2014 12:36 pm
Location: MI USA
Contact:

10.3 gps vs rxp

Post by sellener777 »

How functional is 10.3's stock gps? I may be tasked with setting up a system for IFR training and part of it hinges on having an accurate gps for approaches. I am used to rxp in xp9. But if the stock units database in 10.3 can be updated and all logic is same or very close I may feel better about setting it up with xp10.3(i believe rxp can be made to work in xp 10 32bit) but i havent done it yet.

Also the student flys a 206 and carenado doesnt support xp9 anymore as far as i see.

Thanks
tshuff
Posts: 152
Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2014 4:51 pm
Location: Massachusetts, USA

Re: 10.3 gps vs rxp

Post by tshuff »

The new GPS was built by Philip primarily to aid him with his IFR training. Here's a writeup on it straight from the dev:
http://developer.x-plane.com/2014/03/ne ... ane-10-30/

My experience has been extremely positive. Every airplane that has it has been made much better.
Keith Smith
Posts: 9939
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 8:38 pm
Location: Pompton Plains, NJ
Contact:

Re: 10.3 gps vs rxp

Post by Keith Smith »

the 10.3 gps upgrade is a great step, but the moment I started trying to do the things I do in my airplane, it fell short.

I would use SImAVIO's Garmin implementation if it's for r/w flight training.
sellener777
Posts: 140
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2014 12:36 pm
Location: MI USA
Contact:

Re: 10.3 gps vs rxp

Post by sellener777 »

Thats what I recently figured out as well. Nice effort on the stock gps in 10.3 though!

I was able to get the rxp430 working in 10.3 demo so thats good.
Post Reply