LOC 28L procedure into KMRY
Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2017 8:35 am
Hi all,
Was excited to take my Comanche (callsign N2907G) from KSTS to KMRY last night. At first I wanted to go VFR and utilise the flyways under the SFO bravo but quickly after checking the weather I realised this wasn't going to happen so I decided to file IFR. I noticed the winds were pretty high gusting 25kts at the destination and the weather was 4 visibility with low cloud cover. I thought what the heck I'm IFR lets go for it. So I'm about 60 miles out, I check the ATIS and it says expect LOC 28L approach. So I briefed myself and thought I might have trouble actually getting in here. According to the plate the minimums was 1860ft with 3 visibility. The actual weather was reporting 2 visibility, broken at 500 and overcast at 1200.
I intercepted the localiser and the controller wished me "good luck", never a good sign. A 737 landed in front of me and reported windshear +/-10 all the way to the surface. Greeeeeaat. Here's me in my little Comanche hoping for the best. If I'm reading the plate correctly the 1860-3 on the plate indicates I need be in visual range of the approach lights or runway at 1860ft and visibility has to be 3 or greater. I passed this mark and could see nothing so I executed missed approach, this meant a hold at the Salinas VOR and in the end had to divert 40 miles north to San Jose International.
Can someone with more knowledge and experience than me let me know if I flew this correctly? I'm really curious why the controller cleared me for the approach when the weather was below minimums. Is the responsibility here on the pilot to attempt the approach (or not) rather than the burden on ATC to tell you otherwise?
Cheers
Sid
Was excited to take my Comanche (callsign N2907G) from KSTS to KMRY last night. At first I wanted to go VFR and utilise the flyways under the SFO bravo but quickly after checking the weather I realised this wasn't going to happen so I decided to file IFR. I noticed the winds were pretty high gusting 25kts at the destination and the weather was 4 visibility with low cloud cover. I thought what the heck I'm IFR lets go for it. So I'm about 60 miles out, I check the ATIS and it says expect LOC 28L approach. So I briefed myself and thought I might have trouble actually getting in here. According to the plate the minimums was 1860ft with 3 visibility. The actual weather was reporting 2 visibility, broken at 500 and overcast at 1200.
I intercepted the localiser and the controller wished me "good luck", never a good sign. A 737 landed in front of me and reported windshear +/-10 all the way to the surface. Greeeeeaat. Here's me in my little Comanche hoping for the best. If I'm reading the plate correctly the 1860-3 on the plate indicates I need be in visual range of the approach lights or runway at 1860ft and visibility has to be 3 or greater. I passed this mark and could see nothing so I executed missed approach, this meant a hold at the Salinas VOR and in the end had to divert 40 miles north to San Jose International.
Can someone with more knowledge and experience than me let me know if I flew this correctly? I'm really curious why the controller cleared me for the approach when the weather was below minimums. Is the responsibility here on the pilot to attempt the approach (or not) rather than the burden on ATC to tell you otherwise?
Cheers
Sid