Page 2 of 2
Re: The XP10 x64 Demo help?
Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2013 11:12 am
by Ryan B
The Profile is better from a sensitivity perspective. Still I guess XP10 doesn't support a roll motion in the VC. So I'll have to adjust when I fly FSX to XP.
The Cessna is a nice upgrade from the stock model. It definitely feels better than the default one. I also adjusted my curves to your post above which helped.
Re: The XP10 x64 Demo help?
Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2013 11:15 am
by Keith Smith
I'm a fan of keeping the stablity sliders (the ones on the left) all the way to full realism. There's a lot of subtlety in the physics which are chucked out the window (just my opinion) when the artificial stability is introduced. I'm all for reducing sensitivity, but not for neutering the flight model
Re: The XP10 x64 Demo help?
Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2013 1:32 pm
by Ryan B
Maybe it's just the stock C172 but all the way to left = unrealistic feel for me...
I'm sure it's like FSX.. once I get a payware model it will be tons better.
Oh, btw, XP10 arrived in the mail today yay!
Re: The XP10 x64 Demo help?
Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2013 1:36 pm
by Keith Smith
The stock C172 has many probems, not a good benchmark. Try Chandler's Pipers (they're $1 each, effectively), or Chris' modified 172.