Page 1 of 1

r/w ATC rant

Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 5:59 pm
by Keith Smith
Saw this on another forum. Thought it was worthy of a repost here. He makes great points. It sounds like a pilot didn't want to spend time getting his clearance on the ground, so he departed 'vfr' (with all nearby weather stations reporting below VFR minimums), asked questions indicating that he probably wasn't able to maintain VFR, and then picked up his clearance in the air. The post below contains the commentary from a controller that was watching and hearing things unfold. Worth a read, especially the part about the A320. "Big sky" theory doesn't always work. Being in the clouds without an IFR clearance can kill you, regardless of your skill level, because you may not know what else is out there.

My guess is this is actually going to get worse once ADS-B is more prevalent and people have the big picture of the surrounding traffic.
This may or may not have happened recently. I am being vague to protect the guilty. Apologies in advance if the post seems a bit...snarky.

Busy class B airport reporting IFR weather. Bad IFR weather. 700 foot ceilings, 3/4 mile visibility blowing snow, IFR weather. Nearby reporting stations report the same weather. PIREP's all morning talk about moderate icing in the climb with tops near FL250. Only the air carriers and biz jets are flying in this muck today. ATC doesn't see VFR targets or light GA aircraft on a day like today.

Our flight data coordinator has a few proposal strips (aircraft that filed an IFR flight plan but haven't gotten a clearance) for our surrounding uncontrolled airports. All day long they've been timing out. Most likely people deciding it's better to wait a day instead of trying to brave this muck. No big deal. After seeing how bad the weather is, it's a smart decision.

We observe an aircraft depart an uncontrolled airport 20 miles west of our primary airport on a VFR code. The "VFR" aircraft departed heading towards several aircraft vectored to an instrument approach. We (the entire radar room) observe the aircraft turn to the north, then to the west, and then the southwest all while flying about 500-1000 feet below our minimum vectoring altitudes.

Turns out this aircraft was one of our proposals, a Colombia going a few states west. The aircraft calls up our departure/satellite controller and asks for an immediate IFR clearance. Since the flight strip with this aircraft's information is at flight data (a 30 foot walk away), the departure/satellite controller told the aircraft to maintain VFR and stand by.

The pilot said in response, "just out of curiosity, what minimum vectoring altitude do you guys have to use out here?" The departure controller told him the MVA, and re-stated to the pilot to maintain VFR. The pilot responded with a simple roger (but magically climbed up to the MVA altitude).

After about a minute, controller gives the IFR clearance, ships aircraft to next sector, and a room full of controllers have great fodder for conversation. One guy mentioned how that could have turned into making the news easily, which led me to write up a few things we talked about:

<rant>

1) ATC don't like stupid. Stupid hurts. Stupid can kill. The time you save by departing into marginal, or (worse) into IFR conditions can create a huge distraction for you. You can hit stationary (obstructions) or non-stationary (aircraft) objects. Contrary to belief, ATC isn't sitting here with your flight plan ready, just itching for you to call so we can issue a clearance. We got stuff to do, like keep planes already in the system from hitting each other. But when you do stupid, you distract us from what we got to do. Because now we do what little we can to make sure your stupid doesn't kill.

2) When the stupid urge hits you, asking "innocent" questions tells us, "Hi! I'm stupid! I'm in the soup and I know I can't maintain VFR. But I'm gonna be crafty stupid and ask a 'curious' question so I don't kill myself!" When the weather is marginal or hard IFR and we are asked for a "vector to the airport" or "what's your MVA" we know you aren't curious. We ain't stupid.

3) Stupid not only kills, it creates anarchy. The ATC system works because it's orderly. When you call for clearance on the ground, we find a spot for you in the system. Granted, on a snow day, a small delay could allow snow to accumulate on your wings. Taking off VFR into hard IMC could take care of the snow issue, but now you're flying blind and hoping the controller isn't busy. Turns out, the controller wasn't busy - this time. 10 minutes earlier, he was up to his neck in airplanes. Lucky timing.

And last but not least...

4) When you are stupid and it works, it's blind luck. We could call it "stupid" luck. But it's nothing more. As stupid luck goes, this Columbia was 2 miles from getting into an Airbus 320's grill if he kept climbing. Keep being stupid and luck runs out. When it does, your stupid might take you out. If your stupid luck runs out the wrong way, it might take an A320 with you.

Please. Pretty please. Take the extra five minutes. Use some cell minutes. Do it the right way.

Or if weather is a factor, just don't go.

Thanks.

</rant>

Re: r/w ATC rant

Posted: Sat Jan 04, 2014 8:49 am
by Rick Stratman
Yea its amazing what people do to save a few minutes.

Now my question is since this guy was not following the VFR rules, and ATC knows who it is will this person get his/her certificate revoked or suspended?

Re: r/w ATC rant

Posted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 5:29 pm
by Ryan B
He was probably breaking rules but you can't be certain he was right? Unless there were other aircraft in the very close proximity reporting IMC. Maybe he found a hole?

Re: r/w ATC rant

Posted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 7:33 pm
by Keith Smith
Ryan, I asked myself the same thing. But...
Bad IFR weather. 700 foot ceilings, 3/4 mile visibility blowing snow, IFR weather. Nearby reporting stations report the same weather. PIREP's all morning talk about moderate icing in the climb with tops near FL250.
I've seen cases during thunderstorms where fields 5 miles away have significantly better weather, but it's harder to imagine that would be the case here with top FL250 all over the place.

Then we have:
The aircraft calls up our departure/satellite controller and asks for an immediate IFR clearance
The pilot said in response, "just out of curiosity, what minimum vectoring altitude do you guys have to use out here?" The departure controller told him the MVA, and re-stated to the pilot to maintain VFR. The pilot responded with a simple roger (but magically climbed up to the MVA altitude).
Many signs pointing to the same conclusion. It's not open and shut, but there's multiple signs.

Even if he did find a hole, it would be very lucky given those circumstances, and it was still a pretty big mistake to depart without the clearance. Finding a hole is one thing...but was he really 500ft below other clouds, or 2000ft laterally? If a jet popped out from one of those clouds, would he have had to time to avoid it? It's not just a matter of being clear of clouds, you have to be significantly clear of clouds.

Re: r/w ATC rant

Posted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 9:42 pm
by Ryan B
I hear you hehe. Definetly a bad choice! Just saying nothing can be proven.