Page 1 of 1
Keeping transmissions short
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2017 12:38 am
by Stubsound
Hi.
Is there any value in using the callsign around untowered airfields, like Oceano?
Are we to choose runway based on the wind sock, or closest ATIS? I sometimes hear that the wind favors 29/25 at San Luis, but the wind sock at Oceano can favor departure from runway 11.
Thank you.
Re: Keeping transmissions short
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2017 10:51 am
by chaseklvk
By "using the callsign around untowered airfields" I assume you mean transmitting on the CTAF frequency using your callsign when operating around Oceano. While not required, it's good practice to transmit your intentions to other pilots with your callsign. In certain situations it may be beneficial to transmit other information about your aircraft (i.e. type and color) in order for pilots to more easily identify you, especially if the airport is busy. As for runway selection, the sectional chart list the "calm wind" or standard runway for that airport. In the case of Oceano, the sectional chart reads "RP 11" indicating right traffic for runway 11. If the wind at the field favors 29, then take 29.
CZ
Re: Keeping transmissions short
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2017 11:34 am
by Stubsound
Thanks.
Yes, I meant CTAF transmissions (122.70 in this case). I've heard pilots use various terms, so I got confused. It didn't help that a drone (and a PE customer) departed Oceano 29 with a pretty hefty tailwind, but I assume pre-recorded flights ignore the weather.
I have seen on Skyvector that Oceano 11 is right pattern, so I get that.
Thanks again. Excited to learn more as I get along.
Re: Keeping transmissions short
Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 11:26 am
by HRutila
See Non-Towered Airport Communications in the FAA Aeronautical Information Manual.
Re: Keeping transmissions short
Posted: Sat Sep 30, 2017 1:23 am
by Stubsound
Will do. Thanks, Harold.