I'm not Keith, but this was the peak of what have been above average traffic levels for the last couple of weeks, which seems to be timed well with the holidays so that's what my money is on.Keith, What are your thoughts about this? IE is it part of a trend or is it from people being off for the holidays? Or maybe newbies that got a new sim for X-mas?
Each controller has their own technique on how they handle busy traffic. Personally I like to use "pre-stacking" which increases the amount of time until I have to talk to that aircraft. Additionally, I increase the amount of reports I request from pilots. Each report is a "reminder" to get back to that pilot to issue the next set of instructions.Does "pre-stacking" instructions have an impact on the controller's work load (positive or negative)?
We can do this when busy but we really try not to. Unlike the real world we are here to provide a service to paid customers who are trying to practice these specific things with ATC interaction. If there is no other option we can revert to deny service (in the areas you bring up) but it's really a last resort.Another question. In real life, will there be times when a controller is too busy to allow things like Bravo transitions, multiple touch and go's, rating tests, or reading weather reports? Is this a tool that the PilotEdge controllers could use to lighten their work load during busy times? Could encouraging more use of "focus fields" help reduce ATC work load?
Concentrating traffic to the focus fields actually increases our workload as we have more aircraft conflicts to resolve.
Our ideal answer is to bring more controllers online as traffic increases. This has a lag obviously and requires us to have controllers available. We were actually pretty good on getting the increased staffing yesterday but there were a couple of hours where we were behind. We do plan staffing based on historical traffic data, but this Sunday had traffic double to triple our normal average (on what is already our busiest day of the week).
If traffic like this continues we will obviously have more controllers on the schedule. We can scale our staffing up to real world levels if needed so it's nearly impossible to break the system with traffic.
Yes, however we are focused on the controller side of this right now. We have several tools that controllers use to reduce the time they need to issue a clearance. We just finished the implementation of one of these tools (an internal routing database that controllers use to look up routes). We don't currently plan to roll out the pilot side (PDC). Note we do use abbreviated clearances when the controller manual allows us to. That however requires pilots to file the correct route which is not a given.Has any thought been given to using "pre-departure clearance(PDC)" or "abbreviated delivery clearance"?
The controller who worked your flight airborne wanted me to let you know that he is sorry that he wasn't able to provide the high level of service that you are used to. Simply put he had a ton of airplanes.I agree the traffic is great, but the staffing levels couldn't keep up when I was flying. The controllers were swamped. They were doing the best they could, but I couldn't get a word in on the radio that wasn't stepped on by another pilot on another frequency. Once in the air, I wasn't getting instructions in a timely manner, and I had to keep asking for things (like getting up to a safe altitude). Even that didn't go great because I couldn't get through on the frequency. Finally just cancelled IFR because I wasn't going to get my approach clearance in time.
I was on for a good part of yesterday and had a great time working with a lot of traffic. We hope to see you all back in the virtual skies soon.