Aircraft and equipment compatibility

Bidimus
Posts: 68
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2015 11:59 am

Aircraft and equipment compatibility

Post by Bidimus »

Couple quick questions about PE and non typical aircraft and equipment. First off is non-transponder equipped aircraft. I have a beautiful freeware Piper Super Cub I like to fly but it is only equipped with a single com radio. My understanding is this would be legal for flight outside of mode C required airspace but Vatsim requires you to squawk VFR regardless which wouldn't be possible with this aircraft. How does PE stand on this topic?

On a related note, is there a list anyplace I can find to see what planes PE models out to show other pilots. For example, if I chose to fly my Super Cub and have a small fly-in, would anyone else be able to see it? Or what about something more obscure like an autogyro? And if I flew an airplane that isn't natively modeled, what would the other pilots see?
Image
Peter Grey
Posts: 5716
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:21 pm

Re: Aircraft and equipment compatibility

Post by Peter Grey »

Couple quick questions about PE and non typical aircraft and equipment. First off is non-transponder equipped aircraft. I have a beautiful freeware Piper Super Cub I like to fly but it is only equipped with a single com radio. My understanding is this would be legal for flight outside of mode C required airspace but Vatsim requires you to squawk VFR regardless which wouldn't be possible with this aircraft. How does PE stand on this topic?
We do not follow the VATSIM rule regarding transponders. So if you are in airspace that doesn't require a transponder you don't need one here.

However there is a caveat to this. Real world controllers have the ability to "radar identify" non transponder equipped aircraft, we don't have this ability here so if you don't have a transponder and we are at all busy you won't be able to get any sort of radar service from us.
On a related note, is there a list anyplace I can find to see what planes PE models out to show other pilots.
I'll have to defer to Keith on the list.
For example, if I chose to fly my Super Cub and have a small fly-in, would anyone else be able to see it?
It depends, most likely not.
Or what about something more obscure like an autogyro?
Once again most likely not.
And if I flew an airplane that isn't natively modeled, what would the other pilots see?
They will see a C172.
Peter Grey
PilotEdge Director of Quality Assurance and Operations
peter@pilotedge.net
Keith Smith
Posts: 9943
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 8:38 pm
Location: Pompton Plains, NJ
Contact:

Re: Aircraft and equipment compatibility

Post by Keith Smith »

The Piper Cub is included in the CSL with X-Plane, so other xplane users will see you. The stock Piper Cub from FSX is also referenced so FSX users should see you as well. The ICAO code is "J3"
NameCoin
Posts: 67
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2014 2:43 pm
Contact:

Re: Aircraft and equipment compatibility

Post by NameCoin »

I've heard that there is a provision to the Mode C requirement in 91.215: http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SI ... 5&rgn=div8.
Notwithstanding paragraph (b)(2) of this section, any aircraft which was not originally certificated with an engine-driven electrical system or which has not subsequently been certified with such a system installed, balloon or glider may conduct operations in the airspace within 30 nautical miles of an airport listed in appendix D, section 1 of this part provided such operations are conducted—
Many conditions follow. Does the Piper Cub fall into this category?
Bidimus
Posts: 68
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2015 11:59 am

Re: Aircraft and equipment compatibility

Post by Bidimus »

Thanks guys. I had no idea that IRL aircraft were radar identifiable without a transponder.

So is the C172 default regardless of the size of airplane I'm flying? Something like the Spruce Goose perhaps?

One more specific question, what about a Grumman Goose (G21)? This is my go-to airplane for FSE. :)
Image
Keith Smith
Posts: 9943
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 8:38 pm
Location: Pompton Plains, NJ
Contact:

Re: Aircraft and equipment compatibility

Post by Keith Smith »

You should connect with the correct ICAO code for the aircraft you are flying. The system will find the closest match from the models which are known to be available in the library.
Nelson L.
Posts: 351
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2015 6:18 pm
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Aircraft and equipment compatibility

Post by Nelson L. »

Keith Smith wrote:The system will find the closest match from the models which are known to be available in the library.
This is why I don't do programming..... Is it sorted based on manufacturer, # of engines, model, or what?
X-Plane 10.45
Pilotedge - V3/I11 (N2253F; UAL/CAL 2253; TPX___)
Alphabet Challenge - 2 Legs Completed
Keith Smith
Posts: 9943
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 8:38 pm
Location: Pompton Plains, NJ
Contact:

Re: Aircraft and equipment compatibility

Post by Keith Smith »

All those things. Actually, more to do with number of engines, type of engines and size.
Bidimus
Posts: 68
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2015 11:59 am

Re: Aircraft and equipment compatibility

Post by Bidimus »

Very interesting. I think I'll have to get my buddy to sign on with me and try out a few odd ball airplane just to see what comes up. Could be a laugh. :)
Image
Ryan B
Posts: 856
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 2:37 pm

Re: Aircraft and equipment compatibility

Post by Ryan B »

Bidimus wrote:Thanks guys. I had no idea that IRL aircraft were radar identifiable without a transponder.
This is not what SCT (socal tracon) sees as they use much better stuff than we have... but we have an ASR 8 at work and the circled items are primary targets... and there's methods to identify and provide radar advisories to these aircraft.

So if you're flying along and your xpndr is OFF the controller will see something like this on their scope (the newer scopes are STARS and the targets will be blue instead of green)

Image
PE ID: 29
FAA ATCS
FAA PPL ASEL
Post Reply