From a business standpoint, why not PHX?

sasbird
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 8:42 pm

From a business standpoint, why not PHX?

Post by sasbird »

First off, I love both the idea and execution of pilot edge and I am so grateful to be able to use it for real world training.

I read in another thread that the next area of coverage expansion will be Oakland Center and, to be honest, I was a little surprised. Seeing as the coverage area is already encroaching on Phoenix with Yuma and the Grand Canyon, I just assumed it would be the next area to be added. Especially considering the large number of flight schools in the area that would no doubt embrace the service if they could practice the approaches in their own backyard. I did see that ASU is using pilot edge (congratulations) but they have a relatively small student population compared to the other flight schools in the area. I know of one (dont want to name drop) that has a room with 20 fsx simulators for the students to use.

Anyway, I hope this doesn't come across as criticism as that was not my intention. I'm sure a lot goes into expanding your coverage area and I was more curious than anything.

-Bruce
Keith Smith
Posts: 9943
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 8:38 pm
Location: Pompton Plains, NJ
Contact:

Re: From a business standpoint, why not PHX?

Post by Keith Smith »

There are indeed some commercial opportunities around PHX which may tip the scales. We'll see how it goes. If you want to PM me with the name drop, go ahead :)
lwilliams
Posts: 206
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 8:32 pm
Location: Guelph, Ontario

Re: From a business standpoint, why not PHX?

Post by lwilliams »

Keith Smith wrote:There are indeed some commercial opportunities around PHX which may tip the scales. We'll see how it goes. If you want to PM me with the name drop, go ahead :)
I personally hope it doesn't.
Lee Williams
Nelson L.
Posts: 351
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2015 6:18 pm
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: From a business standpoint, why not PHX?

Post by Nelson L. »

lwilliams wrote:I personally hope it doesn't.
May I ask why?
X-Plane 10.45
Pilotedge - V3/I11 (N2253F; UAL/CAL 2253; TPX___)
Alphabet Challenge - 2 Legs Completed
hoser70
Posts: 169
Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2013 1:48 pm

Re: From a business standpoint, why not PHX?

Post by hoser70 »

lwilliams wrote:
Keith Smith wrote:There are indeed some commercial opportunities around PHX which may tip the scales. We'll see how it goes. If you want to PM me with the name drop, go ahead :)
I personally hope it doesn't.
???
Thanks,
Lance

NDB Air
stevekirks
Posts: 589
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2014 6:00 pm
Location: KSGF
Contact:

Re: From a business standpoint, why not PHX?

Post by stevekirks »

lwilliams wrote:I personally hope it doesn't.
Asking the same as the others--why not?

I would be more worried about too many "gamers" paying for PE and causing the network to be full of "junior pilots" that don't respect the rules. Rising tide floats all boats, so I say "go" to any expansion.
Steve Kirks (sKirks on Twitch)
KSGF--I-10 rated
Student Pilot
I invented the Alphabet Challenge, what's your excuse?
Alphabet Challenge
Nelson L.
Posts: 351
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2015 6:18 pm
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: From a business standpoint, why not PHX?

Post by Nelson L. »

stevekirks wrote:I would be more worried about too many "gamers" paying for PE and causing the network to be full of "junior pilots" that don't respect the rules.
Cost vs Reward - I doubt that type of pilot would 1) Be willing to pay for PE and 2) Be on the network very long (either by choice or controller enforcement). I have a sneaking suspicion lwilliams made a typo, but then again, I don't know anything...
X-Plane 10.45
Pilotedge - V3/I11 (N2253F; UAL/CAL 2253; TPX___)
Alphabet Challenge - 2 Legs Completed
lwilliams
Posts: 206
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 8:32 pm
Location: Guelph, Ontario

Re: From a business standpoint, why not PHX?

Post by lwilliams »

I should NEVER rush my email responses while very busy at work. Sorry for any confusion guys/gals.

I would absolutely love expansion, but my personal preference is strictly based on geography. I love the coast lines, San Francisco Bay area and all the mountains. To me (uneducated to most USA geography, Phoenix is mostly flat desert (yawn). If just the airport KPHX, then it caters to heavies, which I guess is fine for some folks.

Not meant to offend anyone, nor a big deal, just a personal preference.

At the end of the day, PE is a great tool for training and training centers and if that's where it expands, then that's where it expands.
Lee Williams
Nelson L.
Posts: 351
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2015 6:18 pm
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: From a business standpoint, why not PHX?

Post by Nelson L. »

While I would normally agree with you, above SFO is 2 Charlies and a Delta (all relatively far from the main SOCAL area) - you would have to go up significantly higher to find more congested airspace. Below SAN is Mexico - off limits. That leaves eastward expansion, although its up to Keith and company to decide which area to expand to that would provide the most benefit to PE as a whole. Unfortunately, outside of SOCAL is all desert, so I'm afraid you're stuck in that regard....
X-Plane 10.45
Pilotedge - V3/I11 (N2253F; UAL/CAL 2253; TPX___)
Alphabet Challenge - 2 Legs Completed
Tim Krajcar
Posts: 503
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 11:41 am
Location: KPDX
Contact:

Re: From a business standpoint, why not PHX?

Post by Tim Krajcar »

Nelson L. wrote:Below SAN is Mexico - off limits
Says who?

8-)

(To be clear, I'm 100% kidding, and not speaking as a representative of PE with regards to any expansion plans into Mexico, or as we call it around the office, "El Projecto Burrito Grande")
Tim Krajcar
Live streams at http://twitch.tv/Tim_PE
View past flights on YouTube
Post Reply