
Here is my issue. I have already put the constraint on myself of flying within PE coverage area for the most part, at least landing\departing from a covered airport. I am also currently committed to only flying a Cessna 210 and that is for RW purposes. Those 2 constraints added to having no FSE money means my options are quite limited on the rental side. What are peoples thoughts on flying aircraft that are very similar to a 210 but are not in fact a 210. A 206, 177, 207 are similar in my opinion and in some cases would limit me to less seats. After searching the FSE forums I couldn't find any ethical opinion on it. I figured I would ask here as you would appreciate the PE coverage area constraint.
I would commit to not flying anything that was faster or bigger that the 210, meaning I wouldn't pretend to be in a 208 and carry additional passengers.
I haven't even tested it but I think the mapping function would allow such an override. I figured it is possible that flying the 210 as a 177 could give a bust based on speed.
I am not really looking for permission so much as opinions and perspective.